For media studies, civics & journalism classrooms

Every article becomes a lesson.

TruthLens analyses a real news article — its claims, sources, framing, language, emotional techniques and missing context — and turns what it finds into a lesson you can teach. Not a template. Built from the evidence in the article itself.

Free to start
Same analysis on Free and Pro
Built for real-world reporting

Already have an account?

TruthLens reads the article, finds the evidence and signals in it, and builds the lesson from what it finds. The lesson is inseparable from the article that produced it.

From article to lesson

1

Scan a real article

Paste any news article. TruthLens reads the whole thing.

2

See what is really in it

Claims, sources, framing, language, emotional techniques and missing context — laid out.

3

Turn it into a lesson

A composed lesson built from the evidence in that article, configured for your class.

4

Teach it

Assign it, or run a live lesson where student thinking appears as it happens.

5

See the thinking

Responses tie back to the evidence — what students noticed, and what they missed.

From article to classroom

The article provides the evidence. TruthLens builds the learning around it.

No generic lesson template and no verdict for students to accept. The reporting itself becomes the material they investigate.

01

Start with real reporting

Bring the article into the classroom

Scan a story you are already teaching. TruthLens keeps the article at the centre instead of replacing it with a generic worksheet.

02

Surface the evidence

See what is worth interrogating

Claims, supporting sources, framing, language and missing context are separated into evidence students can question for themselves.

03

Turn evidence into learning

Build the activity around what was found

Questions and discussion prompts stay tied to the evidence in that specific article — ready for students to analyse, respond and reflect.

Example classroom activity

Who is this article listening to?

Analyse

Source article

Social media ban for under-16s: who decides what is best for young people?

BBC News

Claim to check

The government says legislation banning under-16s from social media will be introduced this year.

Framing signal

Officials are quoted first and most often; the voices of young people themselves are absent.

Question for students

Does hearing from officials first make the policy feel more settled than it is? What would change if young people were quoted?

Students receive the evidence and the questions — not a TruthLens verdict. The judgement stays with them.

One article. Its actual evidence. A classroom activity students can genuinely interrogate.

Try it with an article

See how your class is thinking

As students submit, TruthLens brings their work into one teacher view — then surfaces recurring themes, different interpretations, notable observations and a discussion prompt grounded in their responses.

Teacher workspace

Activity progress & marking

Track submissions, review student work and turn the class response into something teachable.

5

Enrolled

3

Submitted

1

In progress

1

Reviewed

Student roster

Open submitted work for marking without leaving the activity.

AlexSubmittedReviewedReview work →
SamSubmittedReview work →
JordanSubmittedReview work →
PriyaIn progress
MayaNot started

Class thinking summary

Patterns, gaps and disagreements across submitted responses.

Common themes

  • • Students repeatedly questioned whose voices were included in the article.
  • • Several responses distinguished factual claims from the way those claims were framed.

Different interpretations

  • • Some students read the reporting as strongly opinionated; others thought it remained broadly balanced.

Notable student observations

  • “The article quotes officials more often than people directly affected.”
  • “The phrase “common-sense protections” makes one position sound self-evidently reasonable.”

Language students noticed

common-sense protectionsofficials saydirectly affected

Discussion prompt

Why did some students see the article as opinionated while others read it as balanced? Which specific choices in the text support each interpretation?

This reflects the current teacher workflow: submissions, review and class-level insight in one place.

Same lesson. Different volume.

The analysis and lesson composition are identical on both tiers. Free is limited by how much you can do, not by how good it is.

Free

£0
  • 3 article scans a month
  • 1 active class
  • 3 saved activities
  • 5 new classroom activities a month
  • Same analysis as Pro
  • Same lesson composition as Pro

Pro

Unlimited volume
  • Unlimited article scans
  • Unlimited classes
  • Unlimited saved activities
  • Unlimited new classroom activities
  • Priority support

Scan an article. Teach what is really in it.

Free to start — the same analysis and lesson composition on every plan.